Reviewer 2 has opinions.
Hear them before you submit.
A rigorous AI pre-submission review of your manuscript in minutes — and when the real reviews land, a point-by-point response letter drafted for you. No account. No email. Pay per paper.
How it works
PDF, DOCX, or pasted text. Or paste the reviewer comments you received.
USDC on Base or card. No subscription, no account, no email address.
A private link with your structured review or complete response-letter draft, in minutes.
Pricing
One paper, one price. Compare: traditional editing services charge $99–300 with 3–7 day turnaround.
Try it free
Paste one reviewer comment. Get one professionally-worded response paragraph. No signup.
What's in the review?
Structure & clarity
Does your abstract match your actual results? Where does the argument leak? What will confuse a tired reviewer at 11pm?
Methodology audit
Missing controls, power issues, unverified assumptions, reproducibility gaps — flagged as MAJOR or MINOR with concrete fixes.
Claims vs evidence
Every central claim checked against the evidence you actually present, plus the three gaps most likely to get you rejected.
Editor's verdict
A realistic accept / revise / reject estimate and the top 5 highest-impact changes to make before you submit.
FAQ
- Is this ethical to use?
- Yes. Pre-submission review and response-letter drafting are the same services editing companies have sold for decades. You review, edit, and approve everything — the science and the final words are yours. We recommend checking your target journal's AI-assistance disclosure policy.
- What happens to my manuscript?
- It is processed on EU-hosted infrastructure, used only to generate your report, never used to train models, and automatically deleted after 30 days. There is no account and we never learn your name or email.
- Why crypto payments?
- USDC payments work for researchers whose cards fail on international payments — and they need no signup anywhere. Card payment is also available.
- What if the result is poor?
- The free demo shows you the quality bar before you pay. If a paid report fails to generate, your private link shows the error and the payment can be refunded to your wallet.
- Which fields does it cover?
- STEM, life sciences, medicine, social sciences, and economics work best. Pure mathematics proofs and highly specialized formal work get a structural review only — it will tell you honestly what it cannot assess.
Guides
- How to Respond to Reviewer Comments: Complete Guide
A step-by-step guide to writing effective responses to peer reviewer comments, with worked examples, templates, and academic etiquette advice.
- Point-by-Point Response Examples: Major vs Minor Revisions
Worked point-by-point response examples for both major and minor revision decisions, with model responses for statistics, novelty, and clarity objections.
- Pre-Submission Peer Review: Catch Rejection Before You Submit
How pre-submission peer review works, what to check before submitting a manuscript, and how to identify the most common rejection reasons in your own work.
- Rebuttal Letter for Journal Rejection: When & How to Appeal
When to appeal a journal rejection, how to write an effective rebuttal letter, and what editors actually consider in editorial appeals.
- How to Respond to Harsh or Unfair Reviewer Comments
How to professionally respond to hostile, dismissive, or unfair peer reviewer comments without losing your argument or your composure.
- Cover Letter vs Response Letter: What Editors Actually Read
The difference between a cover letter and a response to reviewers letter, what each document is actually for, and what editors read carefully vs skim.
- Response to Reviewers Template & Examples That Got Accepted
Proven response-to-reviewers templates with real examples. Includes opening paragraphs, disagreement framing, and point-by-point formats that editors like.
- How to Respond When Reviewers Ask for More Experiments
How to respond to reviewer requests for additional experiments, data, or analyses you cannot or should not provide, with example responses and alternatives.
- Revise and Resubmit: Step-by-Step Strategy for R&R
A practical strategy for handling a revise-and-resubmit decision, from triage to submission, including how to scope revisions and write your response letter.
- Why Papers Get Rejected: 12 Common Reasons and Fixes
The 12 most common reasons academic papers get rejected, with specific fixes for each. Written from an editorial perspective with actionable advice.